The Morals of Chess by Benjamin Franklin (Written In 1750)

Morals of Chess Benjamin FranklinBenjamin Franklin

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: This is a wonderful essay written by Benjamin Franklin.
Benjamin Franklin had the heart of a teacher, which is one of the reasons why he was a great leader and a visionary. Enjoy the read!

THE MORALS OF CHESS BY BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (1750)

The game of Chess is not merely an idle amusement. Several very valuable qualities of the mind, useful in the course of human life, are to be acquired or strengthened by it, so as to become habits, ready on all occasions. For life is a kind of chess, in which we have often points to gain, and competitors or adversaries to contend with, and in which there is a vast variety of good and ill events, that are, in some degree, the effects of prudence or the want of it.

By playing at chess, then, we may learn:

1. Foresight, which looks a little into futurity, and considers the consequences that may attend to an action: for it is continually occurring to the player, If I move this piece, what will be the advantages of my new situation? What use can my adversary make of it to annoy me? What other moves can I make to support it, and to defend myself from his attacks?”

2. Circumspection, which surveys the whole chess-board, or scene of action, the relations of the several pieces and situations, the dangers they are respectively exposed to, the several possibilities of their aiding each other; the probabilities that the adversary may make this or that move, and attack this or the other piece; and what different means can be used to avoid his stroke, or turn its consequences against him.

3. Caution, not to make our moves too hastily. This habit is best acquired by observing strictly the laws of the game, such as, If you touch a piece, you must move it somewhere; if you set it down, you must let it stand. And it is therefore best that these rules should be observed, as the game thereby becomes more the image of human life, and particularly of war; in which, if you have incautiously put yourself into a bad and dangerous position, you cannot obtain your enemys leave to withdraw your troops, and place them more securely; but you must abide by all the consequences of your rashness.

And lastly, we learn by chess the habit of not being discouraged by present bad appearances in the state of our affairs, the habit of hoping for a favorable change, and that of persevering in the search of resources. The game is so full of events, there is such a variety of turns in it, the fortune of it is so subject to sudden vicissitudes, and one so frequently, after long contemplation, discovers the means of extricating ones self from a supposed insurmountable difficulty, that one is encouraged to continue the contest to the last, in hopes of victory by our own skill, or, at least, of giving a stale mate, by the negligence of our adversary.

And whoever considers, what in chess he often sees instances of, that particular pieces of success are apt to produce presumption, and its consequent, inattention, by which more is afterwards lost than was gained by the preceding advantage; while misfortunes produce more care and attention, by which the loss may be recovered, will learn not to be too much discouraged by the present success of his adversary, nor to despair of final good fortune, upon every little check he receives in the pursuit of it.

That we may, therefore, be induced more frequently to chuse this beneficial amusement, in preference to others which are not attended with the same advantages, every circumstance, that may encrease the pleasure of it, should be regarded; and every action or word that is unfair, disrespectful, or that in any way may give uneasiness, should be avoided, as contrary
to the immediate intention of both the players, which is, to pass the time agreeably.

Therefore;

1. If it is agreed to play according the strict rules, then those rules are to be exactly observed by both parties; and should not be insisted on for one side, while deviated from by the other; for this is not equitable.

2. If it is agreed not to observe the rules exactly, but one party demands indulgences, he should be as willing to allow them to the other.

3. No false move should ever be made to extricate yourself out of a difficulty, or to gain advantage. There can be no pleasure in playing with a person once detected in such unfair practice.

4. If your adversary is long in playing, you ought not to hurry him, or express any uneasiness at his delay. You should not sing, or whistle, nor look at your watch, nor take up a book to read, nor make a tapping with your feet on the floor, or with your fingers on the table, nor do any thing that may disturb his attention. For all these things displease. And they do not show in playing, but your craftiness or your rudeness.

5. You ought not to endeavour to amuse and deceive your adversary, by pretending to have made bad moves, and saying you have now lost the game, in order to make him secure and careless, and inattentive to your schemes; for this is fraud, and deceit, not skill at the game.

6. You must not, when you have gained a victory, use any triumphing or insulting expression, nor show too much pleasure; but endeavour to console your adversary, and make him less dissatisfied with himself by every kind and civil expression, that may be used with truth; such as, You understand the game better than I, but you are a little inattentive; or, You play too fast; or, You had the best of the game, but something happened to divert your thoughts, and that turned it in my favour.

7. If you are a spectator, while others play, observe the most perfect silence. For if you give advice, you offend both parties; him, against whom you may give it, because it may cause the loss of his game; him, in whose favour you give it, because, tho it may be good, and he follows it, he loses the pleasure he might have had, if you had permitted him to think till it occurred to himself.

Even after a move or moves, you must not, by replacing the pieces, show how it might have been played better: for that displeases, and may occasion disputes or doubts about their true situation. All talking to the players, lessens or diverts their attention, and is therefore displeasing; nor should you give the least hint to either party, by any kind of noise or motion. If you do, you are unworthy to be a spectator.-If you have a mind to exercise or show your judgment, do it in playing your own game when you have an opportunity, not in criticizing or meddling with, or counseling, the play of others.

Lastly, if the game is not to be played rigorously, according to the rules above mentioned, then moderate your desire of victory over your adversary, and be pleased with one over yourself. Snatch not eagerly at every advantage offered by his unskillfulness or inattention; but point out to him kindly that by such a move he places or leaves a piece in danger and unsupported; that by another he will put his king in a dangerous situation, & by this generous civility (so opposite to the unfairness above forbidden) you may indeed happen to lose the game to your opponent, but you will win what is better, his esteem, his respect, and his affection; together with the silent approbation and good will of impartial spectators.

“Chess Playing Helps Reveal How Brain Works”

Brain FunctionsBrain Disorders

CHESS AND THE BRAIN:

As our knowledge of the brain improves, so does our understanding of what chess can do for its development.

Below, is an article that may be extremely beneficial, as it provides insights from a neurological standpoint about how the brain works during chess play.

The benefits of chess are not all highlighted in this article, but, it should shed some light on a subject that still remains obscure to many.

Chess has long been recognized as a builder of strong intellects, it promotes logical thinking, self-confidence, improves communication and pattern recognition skills, and teaches the values of hard work, concentration, objectivity and commitment, to name a few.

Surprisingly, today there are still people in education that do not completely comprehend the role chess can play in the school curriculum. It is my hope that this article can help on the road to understanding.

You can read more on this by visiting our Chess Articles Section for a wide range of articles covering the subject.

NINDS Website Click Here
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE

Chess Playing Helps Reveal How Brain Works
For release: Wednesday, May 18, 1994 / Date Last Modified: Tuesday, March 08, 2005

Tournament-level chess players are helping scientists at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) identify parts of the brain used in complex problem solving. These studies have revealed a processing network that is distributed throughout the brain, according to Dr. Jordan Grafman and his coworkers. Grafman, who heads the Institute’s Cognitive Neuroscience Section, said that chess playing is an ideal model to help scientists better understand the coordinated work of the brain. The study will be published in the May 19 issue of Nature .*

“Imagine yourself as a chess player about to checkmate your opponent,” Grafman said in describing the work of the brain. “All your knowledge and experience are being retrieved for your next move. First, you perceive the pieces on the board and mentally separate the color-coded pieces. Then you analyze their positions on the board, identify the value of the different pieces, and retrieve the rules of the game for any move. If you are a skilled player like the 10 subjects in this study, you also recognize specific patterns that signify when you have an advantage over your opponent. Finally you have to analyze the consequences of your potential moves and the countermoves of your opponent.”

A brain imaging technique called positron emission tomography (PET) allowed Grafman and his coworkers to separate these steps and identify the parts of the brain used during each stage. A PET brain scan records the increased use of a radioactive tracer when a part of the brain is activated for a particular task.

For chess players, color separation and spatial discrimination activate parts on both sides of the brain toward the back of the head known to be associated with visual processing. Rule retrieval activates two parts on the left side of the brain, a small structure deep within the brain associated with indexing memories and a structure in an area near the left ear associated with memory storage. Checkmate judgment activates areas on both sides near the front of the brain crucial for planning and in the back of the brain important for generating images.

Grafman said experiments like the chess problem are helping improve our understanding of how humans make judgments. According to Grafman, the areas in the front of the brain activated in the checkmate judgment stage may be “managerial knowledge units.” These units are similar to other types of storage in the brain but coordinate a large amount of information in a specific sequence. Grafman said the findings in this study will ultimately be useful in helping people recovering from brain injuries or diseases that affect problem solving and judgment.

The NINDS is the nation’s principal supporter of research on the brain and nervous system and a lead agency for the Congressionally mandated Decade of the Brain. The Institute supports and conducts a broad program of basic and clinical neurological investigations. The NINDS is part of the National Institutes of Health, located in Bethesda, MD.

*Nichelli, P., Grafman, J., Pietrini, P., Alway, D., Carton, J. C., Miletich, R. 1994. Brain activity during chess playing. Nature, vol. 369, no. 6477, p. 191.

How to Tell if Your Child is Ready for Tournament Play

Kasparov All Girls Nationals 2007

Tips on How to Tell if Your Child is Ready for Tournament Play:

  • Your child already participates in a Chess Class and/or has a brother or sister experienced in tournament play.
  • Your child shows an interest in participating in tournament play.
  • If none of the above apply, but, your child shows an exceptional talent with chess and expresses interest in tournament play.
  • Prior to participating in a chess tournament make sure that your child knows all the basic rules of the game, including the special moves, such as Pawn Promotion, en passant and Castles.

NOVICE PLAYERS – THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF TOURNAMENT PLAY:

  • Encouragement and Support: The first time your child plays in a tournament, make sure that he/she knows that they may lose most of the games if not all. This is natural since the other participants may be more experienced. Introduce the concept of playing chess in tournaments as a fun and enriching experience. Remember, practice makes perfect or we can say practice makes masters. The most important thing is to encourage and actively support your child in their interest to play chess.
  • Notation: Writing down the moves is essential for your childs progress in chess. The main learning tool is based on studying and reviewing our games. In chess we learn from our mistakes, and try not to repeat them again.
    Usually for grades K-2, notation is strongly recommended, but, for grades 3-12 it’s a requirement. Therefore, before registering your child in a chess tournament it would be to their advantage if they learned notation.
  • Touch Move and Piece Connection: If you intentionally touch your piece, you must move it if there is a legal way to do this. If you intentionally touch your opponents piece, you must capture that piece if possible. Pieces that are accidentally knocked over, brushed with a palm as you reach for another piece, hit with an elbow, or otherwise inadvertently touched do not need to be moved. If you need to adjust a piece because it is not aligned correctly on the board, you must say, adjust, before you touch the piece. Players are not required to move the piece that they have adjusted in this way.

There are other rules for tournament play.

In scholastic events, usually the Tournament Director will go over the rules before the start of the event.

If you have any questions or comments you may post them on this site – it is a fast and easy way to get a quick response!

Your Contributions & Support Help Us Make a Difference

Donate to ChessChess Donations

The U.S. Chess Trust helps support many chess programs & events !

Help us continue to offer these programs and resources by making your Online Donation today!

Remember, making a donation is fast, easy and secure ! Just click on the Make a Donation button to process your donation – it’s that simple !

Check out our Programs/Resources section for more info on how we support the community !

Want to know who is already helping us make a difference?

Check out our Donors Section for more information about our supporters and contributors !

Las Vegas International Chess Festival (June 5-8): GM Gata Kamsky to Participate in the 2008 National Open

Las Vegas International Chess Festival Gata Kamsky

Las Vegas International Chess Festival:  2008 National Open Championship

The National Open is one of the longest running, premier open tournaments. First established in the 1960′s by Ed Edmondson, the event has been organized by Fred Gruenberg and Al Losoff for more than two decades. They have also added additional championships in recent years, with the National Open being the centerpiece of the Las Vegas International Chess Festival.

This year the $100,000 Prize Fund is based on only 850 players with $75,000 absolutely guaranteed.

World Cup Champion GM Gata Kamsky will participate in this years National Open.

A simul will also be given by Kamsky on Thursday, June 5th at 3pm. He will be available for autographs Friday & Saturday afternoon.

The National Open is a 6 round Swiss System tournament, you can choose between the standard 3-day or alternate 2-day playing schedules. Half-point byes are available for all rounds, with notice to the Tournament Directors or with an advance entry.

Chess sets and boards provided for tournament play only. Bring your own chess clock.  The 2008 National Open Championship section is FIDE rated.

Sections, Schedules and Fees:

Format: 6 Round Swiss System USCF Rated Tournament 200 Grand Prix Points

Sections:

  • Championship
  • Under 2200
  • Under 2000
  • Under 1800
  • Under 1600
  • Under 1400
  • Under 1200
  • Unrated

The Championship (Open) section is open to all players. The under sections are open only to players with USCF June ratings under the section cap.

Players without official ratings may only play in the Open or Unrated section. Verified foreign ratings may used if reliable conversion is possible. 50 Points are added to FIDE ratings.

The decision of the chief tournament director is final regarding eligibility, rating adjustments, conversions, unofficial ratings, the CCA minimum rating list or other rating issues.

If your rating changes in the June supplement you will be moved up automatically or down on request.

Time Control: 40 moves in 2 hours then Sudden Death in 1 hour , 2-day rounds 1-3 and all Unrated rounds Game/60

Registration: Thursday 6-11 p.m., Friday 8-9:30 a.m., Saturday 8-9 a.m.

Rounds:

  • 3-Day: Friday 11 a.m & 6 p.m., Saturday 11 a.m. & 6 p.m., Sunday 10 a.m. & 5 p.m.
  • 2-Day: Saturday 10 a.m., 12:30 p.m., 3 p.m. & join 3-day at 6 p.m. ,
  • Unrated: Saturday 10 a.m., 12:30 p.m. & 3 p.m., Sunday 10 a.m., 12:30 p.m. & 3 p.m.

Entry Fees:

  • $129 by 1/15, $169 by 5/19, $199 by 6/4, $220 on site
  • $35 off advance entry for Juniors under 20 or Seniors over 65
  • $80 added for players rated under 2100 in the Championship section
  • Add 50 cents to advance entry for round 1 bye
  • Add $2 for 2-day schedule (except unrated section)
  • Unrated section $99 by 6/4, $120 on site, counts as 1/2 player for prizes. No discounts.
  • Re-entry $120, counts as 1/2 player for prizes. Not available in Open Section

U.S. Chess Federation Membership is required of all players. You may join with your entry or on site. Players will not be allowed to complete the tournament without a valid membership.

About the GM Gata Kamsky Simul:

The Simultaneous exhibition is limited to 20 boards. Entry Fee is $100. If more than 20 players sign up, names will be drawn to play GM Kamsky. Sign up early, because your name is entered in the drawing when you enter, and again on the first of every month until the simul. No on site registration.

The drawing will be held at 2:45 p.m on Thursday June 5th. If you are not chosen to play GM Kamsky, you will receive a $70 refund and play another Grandmaster. Players who wish to enter the alternate simul may do so for $40.

Two time U.S. Champion GM Alex Yermolinsky will play all comers for $40 a board ($30 for players who signed up for GM Kamsky but whose names were not drawn). GM Yermolinsky’s simul will start at 3:30 p.m. On site registration only.

Players who defeat or draw the Grandmasters will receive autographed prizes.

For detailed information regarding the 2008 Las Vegas International Chess Festival and side events – Please visit their website at www.vegaschessfestival.com.

2008 Scholastic Service Awards

Amateur Team Tournament Chess

After lengthy deliberation the Scholastic Council is pleased to put forth two names for the Scholastic Service AwardStephen Shutt and Michael Khodarkovsky.

This week we will be featuring the recipients of this prestigious award, for the individual awards and the group awards.

In addition, the USCF Scholastic Council has nominated the Southern Arizona Chess Association (SACA) for the Scholastic Service Award – Organization.

These nominations were ratified by the U.S. Chess Federation’s Executive Board.  The official awards will be given to the recipients at the luncheon which usually takes place in conjunction with the USCF’s annual meeting in August 2008.

The Southern Arizona Chess Association (SACA) has been an affiliate of the USCF since 1980.

During the school year, SACA runs a scholastic league for schools throughout Tucson and Southern Arizona.

Thousands of students have played in the league, with monthly tournaments that currently average 250 participants (as high as 425 some years).

The SACA scholastic league has produced state and national individual and team champions at every level, including GM Tal Shaked, the 1995 World Junior Champion.

Check back later this week for more !

58 Schools Participate in Baltimore Citywide Chess Championship

Baltimore Chess

The Baltimore City Schools Chess Championships were held on Tuesday, May 20th.

The championships were graciously hosted by the Center for Talented Youth at Johns Hopkins University.

The competition was intense as the quality of play continues to improve each year.  Over 240 select players represented 58 BCPSS schools at the 2008 event.

Congratulations are in order to the players, coaches, parents and administrators who support chess in the Baltimore City schools!

For more information about the Baltimore Chess League, please check there website at www.baltimorekidschess.org

Wrap-Up Article: 2008 Frank K. Berry U.S. Championships, Yury Shulman and Anna Zatonskih win!

Anna Irina Playoff Analysis Room Playoffs

2008 Frank K. Berry U.S. Championships: It’s a Wrap !

GM Yury Shulman won the 2008 FKB U.S. Championship with a 7-2 score, while IM Anna Zatonskih won the 2008 FKB U.S. Women’s Championship after a long and exhausting playoff match that literally went down to the last second.

Shulman won the 24-player title event sponsored by Frank K. Berry in Tulsa, Oklahoma, using complex positional play that included wins over David Pruess, Boris Gulko, Gregory Kaidanov, Julio Becerra, and Sergey Kudrin. He was only in trouble once, against Eugene Perelshteyn in round 8, but managed to draw a pawn-down ending.

Shulman had a full point lead going into the last round. His opponent, Josh Friedel, needed also a draw to make his 3rd GM norm. Therefore a split result was very agreeable to both of them and a draw happened quickly.

Shulman’s tense win over veteran GM Boris Gulko is an example of his play in this event: Gulko,B (2559) – Shulman,Y (2606) [E04] 2008 FKB U.S. Championship (3), 19.05.2008?

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 dxc4 5.Bg2 a6 6.Ne5 c5 7.Na3 cxd4 8.Naxc4 Bc5 9.Bd2 Nd5 10.Rc1 O-O 11.O-O Nd7 12.Nd3 Ba7 13.Ba5 Qe7 14.Qb3 Rb8 15.Nce5 Nxe5 16.Nxe5 Qf6 17.Nd3 b6 18.Bb4 Rd8 19.Bxd5 Rxd5 20.Rc7 Bb7 21.Be7 Qf5 22.Qc2 e5 23.Rc1 h6 24.Nb4 d3! 25.exd3 Rd7 26.Rxb7 Rbxb7 27.Qc8 Kh7 28.Nxa6 Qxd3 29.Nb4 Qd2 30.Bf8 Rb8 0-1

Alexander Onischuk finished in 2nd place with 6½ points, and Sergey Kudrin was clear third with 6. (See complete standings below.)

In the women’s title event, both Anna Zatonskih and Irina Krush finished with 7½ points.

A playoff between them went all the way to the end: After two Game/15 (+3) contests and two Game/5 (+2) blitz games were split, an aptly-named Armageddon game determined the result of this grueling finale.

The rules for this were as follows: one player would name the times white and black would have (with black having draw odds) and the other to chose which color she wanted. There was no add-on time increment.

Krush had white with 6 minutes, while Zatonskih had 4 ½ minutes and the draw odds. The game was close and entered into a time scramble. At one point Anna had 2 seconds left compared to about 20 for Irina.

But Anna’s had the advantage of draw odds — Irina needed to win, and thus had to take the extra time to make purposeful moves, while Anna could just move the pieces nearest the clock to blitz out as fast as she could her moves.

In the end, Irina lost on time with 0:01 left showing on Anna’s clock!

It was a testiment to how evenly matched and what determined fighters the both are.

Katherine Rohonyan and Tatev Abrahamyan finished tied for third place with excellent 6-3 scores.

Goddesschess.com and The Susan Polgar Foundation donated $500 for the “GoddessChess ‘Fighting Chess’ Award”. This was awarded by Susan Polgar to Tatev Abrahamyan, who had 6 wins, 3 losses, and zero draws.

CruisingThroughLife.com added a nice perk to the first prize, a deal for the winner to join the 2008 Caribbean Gambit Chess Cruise. (see http://cruisingthroughlife.com/chess2008/ )

Full information on the tournaments can be found at monroi.com, which provided an excellent website, videos, and live coverage.

International Arbiter Frank K. Berry was the sponsor of these events for the second year in a row. Jim Berry was chief T.D. and Tom Braunlich was the chief organizer.

A special thanks to Tom Braunlich for providing us with this report!

Yury Shulman Wins the U.S. Championship, Anna Zatonskih Wins U.S. Women’s Championship !

Y Shulman Anna Zatonskih

Yury Shulman Wins the 2008 U.S. Championship and Anna Zatonskih Wins the 2008 U.S. Women’s Championship!

Congratulations to Anna Zatonskih for winning the 2008 U.S. Women’s Championship ! This is a definite highlight in her prominent chess career !

Congratulations Yury ! (Check out the Yury Shulman video clip above)

Yury Shulman – “To become the US Champion is a huge success! All games were tense. I think that the move which won the tournament was Rg4 against Becerra.”

Click Here for FKB U.S. Championship ResultsSTANDINGS AFTER ROUND 9

For more about this exciting event – Click Here

An Exclusive Interview with Larry Kaufman by Jim Eade

An Exclusive Interview with Larry Kaufman by Jim Eade

C. T. How did you learn to play chess? How old were you?

L.K. My father taught me at age 7, and I had a lesson on how to do the king and rook checkmate at age 8 from Harold Phillips, the first USCF president and a New York champion in the year 1895 (!!). His daughter and my mother were best friends from college.

C.T. Who were you biggest influences?

L.K. Fischer was my biggest influence in my teens, although the book that influenced me the most was Reshevsky’s (“How chess games are won”). On a personal level I would say Steve Brandwein.

C.T. How so?

L.K. When I was a college student at M.I.T., Steve lived nearby and we became friends. I was very impressed with his intellect, knowledge, and memory; he was (and presumably still is) a very brilliant man. At the time I was a high Expert while Steve was already retired from regular tournament play with a 2300 rating, which was pretty good back in the mid 1960s. At blitz chess he was much better still, certainly way beyond my level. He taught me a lot about chess (and other things too), but the biggest impact was a twenty game match we played.  Due to the rating disparity we agreed to a 2-1 time handicap; I think Steve took 30′ to my hour.  I thought this would make for a fair match, but I was soon to realize how wrong this was. After 19 games I was still seeking my first win; the score was 10 wins for Steve and 9 draws. Finally by some miracle I won the final game. Just a few weeks later, I was the American Open Champion!! This shows both how much I learned from this match and how strong Steve must have been to score so well against me giving me time odds; my own rating soon hit 2300.

I played many other training matches over the years with various masters, but this was the only one I lost. My match victims in these matches included Bill Hook, Mark Diesen, Larry Gilden, and Arnold Denker. There was also a drawn match in my very early days with Frank Street, who soon became the nation’s second Black chess master.

C.T. When did you begin to suspect a life long love for the game was in the works?

L.K. During high school I oscillated between chess and bridge, but by the time I entered college (at 16) I dropped bridge for chess.

C.T. What was it that attracted you to chess?

L.K. Probably the fact that I was much better at it than almost all my contemporaries, and I made so much progress.  By the time I realized I would not be one of the World’s best players, I was already hooked. I was also attracted by the scientific nature of the game, I always expected to be a scientist or mathematician.

C.T. When you first started, where could you play?

L.K. From the age of 8 to 14, I only played with school mates and occasionally with my father and his chess friends.  But this plus a lot of reading was enough to bring me to Class A level.

C.T. When did you first play a formal game?

L.K. My first tournament was the Maryland Junior Championship in 1961 (age 14).  I placed second.  It was not rated. My first USCF rated game was a D.C. League win over a player rated close to 2000, in 1962.  By 1966 I was American Open Champion and briefly after that the nations’ top rated Junior.

C.T. What was the organized chess scene like back when you first got involved?

L.K. There were tournaments, but very few specifically for kids. We also had the D.C. chess league; I played on the high school allstars team.

C.T. Where there multiple chess clubs or hang-outs?

L.K. D.C. area had the Washington Chess Divan downtown, which I went to when I could get down there.  There was (and still is) the Arlington Chess Club, but I rarely went there.  There was also the Takoma Park Chess Club run by Larry Gilden, which was my main club until it folded.  Gilden was the first really top level player I met, and was my chess hero for years. Many years later we played a 20 game match of game/30, which I won by a single game.

C.T. What was your most memorable game?

L.K. Some games are memorable because of the importance of the game (for example my 1966 win over Jerry Hanken made me American Open Champion, but it was a very easy win) or because of the level of the opponent (my World Open victory over GM Ehlvest about ten years ago when he was rated over 2750, but he made a blunder) and some just due to the game itself.  One that combines all of the above is my last round win in this Senior Open over IM Foygel, a very nice win over a strong opponent in a crucial game.  Of course it’s too recent to call it “memorable” yet, but I think it will qualify a decade from now.

C.T. If you had to choose one chess book as your favorite, which would it be.

L.K. Well, my own book “Chess Advantage in Black and White” must be my favorite, as I invested half a year of my life into it!  But as previously mentioned, the book that taught me the most was Reshevsky’s “How chess games are won” (I think it was later reissued under a different title).

C.T. Has technology (Internet, databases etc.) fundamentally changed the game?

L.K. Very much so.  It is vastly easier now to become a strong player, and the advantage of years of tournament experience is much less than it used to be.  That’s why the peak age for chess has declined from about 35 to under 30.

C.T. How has it affected you over the course of your playing career?

L.K. I’m one of the relatively few players 60 and older who has embraced the new technology.  I am co-developer of “Rybka”, the world’s strongest chess program on all rating lists, and teaching Rybka has apparently improved my own game, as my rating is now at a five year peak despite my age and rating deflation.  Although my calculation ability has surely declined with age, my understanding of chess in general and openings in particular is much improved due to the engines and databases.  Imagine forty years ago if a player could have had Bobby Fischer available 24/7 to answer any chess question to the best of his ability.  Having Rybka at my disposal is even better than that would have been.

C.T. How did it feel to win the Senior Open?

L.K. At the start, I was only really seriously hoping to win the 60 and over prize — the trip to the World Senior in Germany.  Winning the whole shebang was a very pleasant surprise! I never got to win the U.S. Junior championship as the year I was top Junior it conflicted with the Student Olympiad, to which I gave preference.  The Senior title and my American Open win back in 1966 nicely bracket my chess career.

C.T. Will you play in the World Senior tournament?

L.K. Yes. I would play anyway, but the fact that the winner gets the GM title makes it mandatory for me to go, in my first year of eligibility.  I know that winning the World title is no easier than making a GM norm and hence a huge longshot for me, but I would only have to do it once, not three times!

C.T. You son just qualified for the IM title, how did that make you feel?

L.K. It was a great sense of relief for me (and for Ray); the thought of his having to spend many more months globetrotting in search of the final norm after several very near misses was unbearable.  He made the final norm on the same day as the Senior Open awards ceremony!  We believe that we are the only parent/child combination in the U.S. to earn the IM title, though there are some where the parent is an FM.

Congratulations from everyone at the US Chess Trust!